It is now unmistakably clear that "Bholaa Shankar" is unlikely to make a recovery at the box office. In the Monday test, "Jailer" gained an advantage over "Bholaa Shankar." Currently, two distinct postmortem analyses are being conducted on this film.
Some individuals suggest that the damage was inflicted by Chiranjeevi.
According to them, a few days before the actual release, Chiranjeevi subtly insinuated criticisms directed at the Andhra Pradesh government and specific ministers.
Through veiled political comments, he implied that ministers should prioritize crucial matters such as special status, welfare initiatives, and employment guarantees instead of focusing on his or his brother's remuneration.
Certain party activists argue that "Bholaa Shankar" suffered a significant blow due to this. They opine that Chiranjeevi should have concentrated on his films rather than engaging in political matters, attributing the film's disastrous outcome to his words.
Conversely, others attribute this debacle to Meher Ramesh's direction. Analysts contend that if a movie boasts high quality, political criticism would hold minimal sway.
They argue that by genuinely focusing on the content, the general audience would drive the film to success regardless of political implications, and family viewers would flock to theaters.
It's worth noting that Rajnikanth also made some political statements before the release of "Jailer," but the audience propelled it to a big hit.
These analysts assert that the primary reason for "Bholashankar's" failure lies in Meher Ramesh's direction. They allege that Meher chose an outdated and lackluster storyline, which he then inundated with excessive melodrama.
Moreover, they emphasize his failure to extract commendable performances from experienced artists like Chiranjeevi and Keerthy Suresh.
It's important to acknowledge that two divergent interpretations underline this movie's flop. Those not connected with the political context contend that the film stumbled due to Chiranjeevi's remarks, while others attribute it to Meher Ramesh's inability to align with current storytelling trends.
Consequently, Meher Ramesh's prominence faded into obscurity.
